''Rosa glauca is perhaps another good rose for those of us who don’t really like roses!''
..and this from a gardener at Hidcote of all places..
... I read that just as a plant suggestion for some people who don't like roses. Maybe the 'us' here are the readers.
I understand it that way too but I still wouldn't call it that. It almost implies there are two types of people - 1) People who want huge blooms, hundred petals, and are willing to care for a high-maintenance plant and 2) People, who would like a big shrub, once-blooming with very simple single blooms... I don't think so. It's possible that roses are becoming less popular and maybe are seen as too high maintenance for modern gardens, but the divide certainly isn't like that. A rose for someone, who doesn't like roses, could be a DA rose (if their only experience is hybrid teas). Or it could be an easy-care modern groundcover (if they see roses as too difficult). Or it could be a tea rose, to completely step away from usual expectations. But glauca? And are there so many people who don't like roses? How many of them would plant something like glauca?
If the Hidcote gardener had wrote instead ''...for those of you who don't really like roses'' I would have understood because of course glauca is known for its foliage more than the flowers, and hardly looks like a rose at all..
... but saying ''for those of us...'' implies the writer does not care much for them either, which I found extraordinary from within a garden renowned for them.. however, we can all do jobs that we don't much care for, so I suppose you can work in a garden with roses, without liking them too much..
Yes, may be the writer didn't think much or may be he actually didnt like roses.
But it is true, most of my friends think roses are high maintenance plants. I started planting roses as I felt they are low maintenance as compared to perennials which get vanished by slugs/snails, need more regular watering and just fall without proper supports in garden.
I have seen roses surviving and flowering among thickest of hedges, totally overgrown or full of weeds front gardens, completely neglected in railway station etc. To get those perfect blooms or leaves we can feed, weed, mulch or even spray religiously but if no care is given they are one of survivors.
..scented roses today.. 'Desdemona' / 'Dr. O'Donel Browne' 'Tottering by Gently'.. this rose is 6 feet tall on obelisk and readying for 2nd flush.. 'Lilac Bouquet'.. a thornless rambler.. 'Nye Bevan'... 'Wilhelm' hybrid musk rose.. Anthemis 'Tinpenny Sparkle'..
'Armada' / C. 'Niobe'.. Geranium. 'Patricia'.. C. 'Margaret Hunt'.. easy to grow, trouble free.. Iris pallida 'variegata'.. offers good summer foliage.. Veronica longifolia 'Marietta'.. I like this very much.. .hot border, Pebble Beach garden..
But it is true, most of my friends think roses are high maintenance plants.
@newbie77 - for sure. Most of my friends and neighbours think roses are too difficult to even try. They feel very inimidated - by pruning and the risk of 'doing everything wrong' - like with fruit trees. I would say that it's quite hard to get roses to look stunning.
@Marlorena That Armada is astonishing, the arrangement with the clem.
.. a few blooms for today.. 'A Midsummer Night's Dream'.. 'Eustacia Vye'.. I don't like this so much when it turns salmon orange in the middle.. 'Mutabilis'.. growing and spreading quickly.. 'Heritage'.. 'Wild Rover'... 'Gruss an Aachen'...
Posts
It's possible that roses are becoming less popular and maybe are seen as too high maintenance for modern gardens, but the divide certainly isn't like that.
A rose for someone, who doesn't like roses, could be a DA rose (if their only experience is hybrid teas). Or it could be an easy-care modern groundcover (if they see roses as too difficult). Or it could be a tea rose, to completely step away from usual expectations. But glauca?
And are there so many people who don't like roses? How many of them would plant something like glauca?
But it is true, most of my friends think roses are high maintenance plants. I started planting roses as I felt they are low maintenance as compared to perennials which get vanished by slugs/snails, need more regular watering and just fall without proper supports in garden.
I have seen roses surviving and flowering among thickest of hedges, totally overgrown or full of weeds front gardens, completely neglected in railway station etc. To get those perfect blooms or leaves we can feed, weed, mulch or even spray religiously but if no care is given they are one of survivors.
'Tottering by Gently'.. this rose is 6 feet tall on obelisk and readying for 2nd flush..
'Lilac Bouquet'.. a thornless rambler..
'Nye Bevan'...
'Wilhelm' hybrid musk rose..
Anthemis 'Tinpenny Sparkle'..
C. 'Margaret Hunt'.. easy to grow, trouble free..
Iris pallida 'variegata'.. offers good summer foliage..
Veronica longifolia 'Marietta'.. I like this very much..
.hot border, Pebble Beach garden..
'Erfurt' a hybrid musk..
'Marie Pavie' .. a polyantha..
'General Kleber'.. Moss..
'Hume's Blush Tea Scented China'...
'Golden Beauty'...
'Sombreuil'.. a half decent bloom..
.. a few blooms for today..
'A Midsummer Night's Dream'..
'Eustacia Vye'.. I don't like this so much when it turns salmon orange in the middle..
'Mutabilis'.. growing and spreading quickly..
'Heritage'..
'Wild Rover'...
'Gruss an Aachen'...