Forum home Problem solving
This Forum will close on Wednesday 27 March, 2024. Please refer to the announcement on the Discussions page for further detail.

Rowan tree grown leggy

We have recently moved house and have cut back a huge Camellia. A Rowan tree has grown up through it and consequently has a long, thin single trunk with branches starting at the top third. It’s very spindly so  I’d like to cut the top to try and encourage side growth - would this work? It’s about 25’ tall now. 
«1

Posts

  • Pete.8Pete.8 Posts: 11,340
    Yes, it would work.
    I had a similar self seeded rowan.
    I didn't want it to get too high so I cut the trunk almost back to the ground.
    That caused it to send up some more stems from the ground.
    The following year I cut those back to the ground.
    I now have a rowan that is about 15ft with about 8 stems.

    If it is very spindly but now gets good light, you could cut it right back to get more stems from the base of the plant.
    It's basically a type of pruning called coppicing

    Billericay - Essex

    Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
  • edited October 2022
    Thank you!!
  • nutcutletnutcutlet Posts: 27,445
    I would use Pete's plan, cutting it shorter further up makes for an ugly looking tree


    In the sticks near Peterborough
  • JennyJJennyJ Posts: 10,576
    Alternatively you could leave it to develop into a standard tree with a clear trunk, leaving room for other things underneath. That might have been the intention of the previous owner.
    Doncaster, South Yorkshire. Soil type: sandy, well-drained
  • Arthur1Arthur1 Posts: 542
    If you leave it  it will thicken up. This is how many trees develop in woodland, a quick race to the sun  then the survivors can spread sideways. It might take several years but would leave you with a single stemmed natural looking tree.
  • thank you-makes sense! 
  • bédébédé Posts: 3,095
    edited October 2022
    You haven't mentioned the camellia much.  Is there a choice, camellia or sorbus?

    I would favour the camellia over a seedling rowan, and continually prevent the rowan from resprouting until it dies.

     I tried the same technique on a "Debbie" camellia that had grown too big in the wrong place.  I cut it down to about 5 ft and  continued to strip off all new growth over a 3 year period.  The  5ft stem was to give me some leverage in eventually removing the root.  In the end, I was unable to prevent the camellia from growing.  So Debbie won, I relented, it's still there.

    The rowan might be useful as shade for the camellia.  That is another issue.
     location: Surrey Hills, England, ex-woodland acidic sand.
    "Have nothing in your garden that you don't know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful."
  • Pete.8Pete.8 Posts: 11,340
    A rowan gives a great flower display in the spring with lots of nectar for the bees.
    In summer the branches a laden with bright berries for the birds, then the attractive ferny foliage takes on its fabulous autumn colours.

    Camellia looks like a green blob for most of the year - then get 10 days of stunning flowers which look awful when they're dead hanging on the bush, and that's it.
    They provide no food for wildlife either.

    I'd keep the rowan :)

    Billericay - Essex

    Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
  • Haha! It’s not a choice at all, I love them both! The camellia is a great place for the birds to hide and I just love Rowan, they’re beautiful trees!
  • FairygirlFairygirl Posts: 55,117
    If you have suitable growing conditions, and  a suitable climate for their health and welfare   @gina.strudwickLy-isGNS , you can have both - no problem.
    If you're in a dry area, both will struggle, if they're planted in a very sunny site, the camellia will struggle. Rowans can also be moved without too much effort, so you may want to bear that in mind.
    A photo would be useful to give an idea of the way they're both growing.
    Many rowans arrive courtesy of birds. They're not always in an ideal position though. 

    I'd agree with @Pete.8 though - I'd always favour the rowan for the reasons given, but I'm lucky in that I could have both in close proximity.  :)
    It's a place where beautiful isn't enough of a word....



    I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...
Sign In or Register to comment.