This Forum will close on Wednesday 27 March, 2024. Please refer to the announcement on the Discussions page for further detail.
New Hedge - traditional mix or 2 single rows
Hey all, I did have a quick search and didn't see anything that hit the nail on the head so thought I'd just ask.
Just moved in to our first home and want to put a hedge around our front garden as everywhere else just seems to be fences. I do work in the landscape industry but am looking (I think) to do something a little bit different and just want to know if you think it will work or if it's not worth the hassle.
Essentially we have the space for a double staggered hedge and we want it to be a native mix to be as useful as possible from a wildlife perspective. However, we are in an urban environment (albeit in the countryside, but urban nonetheless) so ideally we don't want it to look too messy from the footpath outside. Even if we set it back a bit, we will obviously have to go out there and trim it back to make sure its not sprawling into the footpath, but that then partially negates the positive part of having a decent mixed hedge where you can leave it long enough to have that benefit long into winter/spring etc rather than having to cut it back.
So, the question is . . . should I just stick to a normal traditional double staggered mix the whole way along, clip it tight on the outside and then rotate the cutting on the inside as best for the wildlife . . . OR my secret plan which is to basically run a single row of beech to the perimeter which can be maintained relatively neatly and won't look too messy (also when it holds onto its leaves well into winter I assume that will act as a bit of screening without it needing to be evergreen) . . . then inside it run a single mixed row of Holly, Hawthorne and Vibernum.L with a few Clematis.V and Lonicera.P mixed in and then just maintain that a bit more ecologically minded.
Is my "hedge inside of a hedge" idea just a non-starter? There shouldn't be any shade issues as they will grow up together (besides the Holly obviously which may be a while in catching up).
I've looked everywhere and it seems to just not be the done thing, but I don't see that it is much different than having ornamental shrubs behind a hedge? With the only difference being that it actually is the hedge?
We know we definitely do not just want a single species hedge, we definitely want that extra ecological benefit to it, but equally need to weigh up the need to be neat on one side without having to cut off all the good ecologically beneficial bits all the time. Or does doing the whole thing as a mix still outweigh it in benefits even if its maintained more strictly?
Ideas and thoughts appreciated!
Many thanks.
Just moved in to our first home and want to put a hedge around our front garden as everywhere else just seems to be fences. I do work in the landscape industry but am looking (I think) to do something a little bit different and just want to know if you think it will work or if it's not worth the hassle.
Essentially we have the space for a double staggered hedge and we want it to be a native mix to be as useful as possible from a wildlife perspective. However, we are in an urban environment (albeit in the countryside, but urban nonetheless) so ideally we don't want it to look too messy from the footpath outside. Even if we set it back a bit, we will obviously have to go out there and trim it back to make sure its not sprawling into the footpath, but that then partially negates the positive part of having a decent mixed hedge where you can leave it long enough to have that benefit long into winter/spring etc rather than having to cut it back.
So, the question is . . . should I just stick to a normal traditional double staggered mix the whole way along, clip it tight on the outside and then rotate the cutting on the inside as best for the wildlife . . . OR my secret plan which is to basically run a single row of beech to the perimeter which can be maintained relatively neatly and won't look too messy (also when it holds onto its leaves well into winter I assume that will act as a bit of screening without it needing to be evergreen) . . . then inside it run a single mixed row of Holly, Hawthorne and Vibernum.L with a few Clematis.V and Lonicera.P mixed in and then just maintain that a bit more ecologically minded.
Is my "hedge inside of a hedge" idea just a non-starter? There shouldn't be any shade issues as they will grow up together (besides the Holly obviously which may be a while in catching up).
I've looked everywhere and it seems to just not be the done thing, but I don't see that it is much different than having ornamental shrubs behind a hedge? With the only difference being that it actually is the hedge?
We know we definitely do not just want a single species hedge, we definitely want that extra ecological benefit to it, but equally need to weigh up the need to be neat on one side without having to cut off all the good ecologically beneficial bits all the time. Or does doing the whole thing as a mix still outweigh it in benefits even if its maintained more strictly?
Ideas and thoughts appreciated!
Many thanks.
0
Posts
Edited to say: sorry, forgot to say welcome to the forum @tintinazure
And thanks for the welcome!
The only problems would be getting them all established equally - ie some may not thrive as well as others, depending on the soil/climate etc, and then keeping it all neat enough to look good. If you have enough room, you can keep a good space between them to make maintenance easier, and to give them all more room to get going.
I have a short run that is similar, in that there's blackthorn hedge, and inside is holly, mahonia and laurel with a few other bits and pieces. It provides wind protection, and flowers/berries etc. The drawback is that the blackthorn suckers, and is going to have to come out, but you won't have that problem with your choices.
As @Liriodendron says, it'll be a case of keeping an eye on it all. Good luck with it
I live in west central Scotland - not where that photo is...
Essentially we have the space for a double staggered hedge and we want it to be a native mix to be as useful as possible from a wildlife perspective...we will obviously have to go out there and trim it back to make sure its not sprawling into the footpath, but that then partially negates the positive part of having a decent mixed hedge where you can leave it long enough to have that benefit long into winter/spring etc rather than having to cut it back.
I did originally have Ivy on my list but just concerned it will strangle the hedge, specially whilst it is young, so thought about using 1 or 2 Clematis vitalba on the shadier side and Lonicera periclymenum on the other length of hedge. Slightly concerned the clematis will be just as bad as the ivy but seems like it will be a bit more obviously manageable long term?
A work colleague did suggest that maybe I just do the whole thing as a mix and just manage the external side like the beech as ultimately it probably wont make much difference, but my thoughts were just that the beech will probably handle the tighter clipping a bit better and not look too out of place?
and thanks @Fairygirl . . . we probably do have room to put between them but its not going to be the worlds longest hedge so probably easy enough to manage it as one entity I reckon, just have to keep on top of it in the early years so they grow evenly.
Isn't it in group 3 so ideally can and should basically be cut back completely each year to grow again? Provided you can reach the stem easily within the hedge planting etc. Obviously if it isn't cut back it could definitely become a problem but presumably if it is hit hard every year it should be fine?
Or does it just grow so vigorously that it smothers plants regardless of cutting it right back?