Forum home The potting shed
This Forum will close on Wednesday 27 March, 2024. Please refer to the announcement on the Discussions page for further detail.

Covid-19

1427428430432433919

Posts

  • AuntyRachAuntyRach Posts: 5,291
    A new daily record for deaths today. Plain awful.  

    My garden and I live in South Wales. 
  • Paul B3Paul B3 Posts: 3,154

    License rescinded ; good job !
    Do people like this care for the NHS ? Obviously couldn't give a damn .
  • ObelixxObelixx Posts: 30,090
    edited January 2021
    I don't think being drunk enough to exhibit anti-social behaviour indicates mental health problems, just stupidity, lack of moral compass and, for many, lack of social awareness combined with poor education.   Those are social problems, not mental. 
    Vendée - 20kms from Atlantic coast.
    "The price good men (and women) pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men (and women)."
    Plato
  • punkdocpunkdoc Posts: 15,039
    Social problems are a major cause of mental health problems.
    How can you lie there and think of England
    When you don't even know who's in the team

    S.Yorkshire/Derbyshire border
  • steveTusteveTu Posts: 3,219
    The conversation started as far as I'm aware from what madpenguin said on 474 - ie:

    'My Mum who is 87 was desperate for a hug and I gave her one and I will not apologise for it.

    She lives on her own and I see her everyday but she has been in her home for the best part of a year.

    She has been denied so much by not seeing the rest of her family the least I could do was give her a hug when she asked for one. '

    ...and the follow up on 475:

    'Yes I do talk from hindsight and if she had caught the virus I would still have done the same.
    When you see your Mum in tears a few feet away would you really be so cruel as to deny them a hug?'

    The implication being that it was in some way uncaring and cruel NOT to hug someone who was obviously upset.
    Normally, without Covid, I would agree. But these are different times. Covid can be spread without people realising they have it, and it then forms an infection chain that can damage people's lives outside your immediate contact group. Individual decisions spread like ripples on water. So you need then to define cruel and uncaring, as is it crueler to potentially infect and seriously damage someone you don't know because of a 'caring' action that could have been avoided?
    They're (a survey from Imperial College London) now saying that in early Jan, 1 in 63 people may have had the virus and the infections rates aren't decreasing. If people aren't adhering to the rules - and have their 'special circumstances' - then you can see a potential reason for the numbers not dropping.
    What is a circumstance that says you can potentially act as a link in the chain? Can I hug my daughter who's been in tears? My sis who I haven't seen since Dec 2019 and who's got medical problems? Where is the line?







    UK - South Coast Retirement Campus (East)
  • punkdocpunkdoc Posts: 15,039
    Sorry @Klink, but I totally disagree. As I have said before, taking any risk you like is fine, if it is only you that suffer the consequences of that risk. However, with this virus the risks you take put others at risk. Have you not heard what hospital staff are saying?
    We are so close to the NHS becoming totally overwhelmed, and if that happens so many people will die, because some people decided the risk was worth it.
    How can you lie there and think of England
    When you don't even know who's in the team

    S.Yorkshire/Derbyshire border
  • steveTusteveTu Posts: 3,219
    Why is lecturing only one sided? You could say equally a lecture was also being given on being a caring person. The 'lecture' could be seen to say (to me) that you're cruel and not a caring person if you don't hug someone who is upset and who has issues. But I thought that there was just a discussion with different views. No lectures.
    I say too much I know - so I'll finish by just repeating that when anyone makes a decision re covid that potentially increases the risk, they take the decision away from the chain that may get infected. It imposes their decision on others. Their 'decision' risk may have been assessed to be small, but the risks within the chain may have very different assessments.

    UK - South Coast Retirement Campus (East)
  • KlinkKlink Posts: 261
    edited January 2021
    I understand that @punkdoc ,i've watched the news. Personally i think more coverage of the seriousness of covid should be shown. Only yesterday we had the highest number of cases since the start of the pandemic and what did we have on two main tv channels,Biden being sworn in. Good news it maybe but it overshadowed the seriousness of what's happening here IMO.
    My question is,what do you do when someone is suffering? We try to help i hope.I don't suggest you all go and hug and party,that's NOT what i'm suggesting but,if you have an isolating relative,elderly perhaps who thinks life isn't worth living anymore or if you have someone with a terminal illness and all they would like is a hug,surely you have to weigh up the risks and decide for yourself if you're prepared for the consequences.
    And yes, the consequences may be death as there's not enough hospital beds,staff etc.Take that into account and then choose...
Sign In or Register to comment.