Forum home Talkback
This Forum will close on Wednesday 27 March, 2024. Please refer to the announcement on the Discussions page for further detail.

David austin Roses

Lou12Lou12 Posts: 1,149

I bought a bareroot David Austin rose Gertrude Jekyll and planted it in February. It is specifically a climber for a shady spot, they recommended it gets at least 4 hours sun a day which it does.

I love roses but don't have a lot of experience with them, followed all the instruction to the letter, I intend growing it up a pole like the entrance to the rose garden at Mottisfont as space is limited.

It's now July and the bush is 2 foot high, it was covered in lots of beautiful fragrant flowers and is preparing itself for repeat flowering but I assumed it would be taller than 2 feet by now and I could start training it up the pole.

Am I being over optimistic? I'm not sure how fast they are meant to grow but it's not sending out any long stems.

«1

Posts

  • YviestevieYviestevie Posts: 7,066

    I think you need to be a bit patient.  I have Gertrude in my garden she is a couple of years old and has reached the top of a six ft fence.  The two climbers I planted in the spring (Claire Austin) are about two ft tall and doing well.  Gertrude is not a rampant climber.

    Hi from Kingswinford in the West Midlands
  • Lou12Lou12 Posts: 1,149

    Right, thanks for that - I wondered if I was being impatient.

    The other one, Lady of the Lake is growing quite fast and I think I can start to train it next year but then it is a rambler so it will grow faster.

    At any rate it is something to look forward too the flowers and the smell were wonderful.

  • hogweedhogweed Posts: 4,053

    I have three Gertrude Jekylls and they never grows past 2.5 feet. Never knew it was a climber - are you sure?

    'Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement' - Helen Keller
  • Lou12Lou12 Posts: 1,149

    I emailed the people at David Austin and they told me it was a tall shrub for the back of a border that can be trained into a climber of up to 6-8 foot. They also have it down as a climber on the online website.

  • hogweedhogweed Posts: 4,053

    Gosh - that is interesting. Perhaps mine have been misnamed as they certainly do not look anything like a small climber!!!

    'Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement' - Helen Keller
  • Lou12Lou12 Posts: 1,149

    Well it will be interesting to see if mine stays this height or grows any taller.

     

  • Katherine WKatherine W Posts: 410

    Some DA variety do come both as climber or bush, depending on the rootstock. That said even the most vigourous bare-root climbing rose will not grow much taller than 60-80 cm in its first year, especially if it is flowering a lot.

    Its first task is to make roots. It may take 2 or 3 years before it starts shooting up strongly. Be patient.

  • Dave MorganDave Morgan Posts: 3,123

    Roses never give of their best in the first year. It takes at least a year to form sufficient root systems to support growth. Katherine has got it right with bare root supplied roses. However, potted roses are usually 2 or more  year old plants and can be a different story. If you want more established roses buy potted especially if patience is not a strong point.

  • Lou12Lou12 Posts: 1,149

    I shall be patient, I've waited a long time for my new garden and it's all new, I posted pics on another thread. It did produce loads of wonderful smelling blooms this year all over the bush so I can't complain really.

Sign In or Register to comment.