Forum home Plants
This Forum will close on Wednesday 27 March, 2024. Please refer to the announcement on the Discussions page for further detail.

Dye for pond water

13

Posts

  • LynLyn Posts: 23,190
    I would say not Fairy, we did ask him to comment.
    Gardening on the wild, windy west side of Dartmoor. 

  • BenCottoBenCotto Posts: 4,718
    I agree with Lynn. The commentary on his product was indirectly invited (largely by me) and the initial response was neutral in tone.
    Rutland, England
  • Fishy65Fishy65 Posts: 2,276
    I wouldn't have that stuff anywhere near my pond and find it amusing where we humans consider ourselves answerable only to ourselves. Did nature get it so wrong that we have to constantly 'fix' it's mistakes?
  • LoxleyLoxley Posts: 5,698
    Fishy65 said:
    Did nature get it so wrong that we have to constantly 'fix' it's mistakes?
    Well we're gardeners (rather than people who simply watch our backyards revert to scrub and eventually woodland), so....
    "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour". 
  • Fishy65Fishy65 Posts: 2,276
    That's it WillDB, ignore the context.
  • The MSDS is currently not online for copyright reasons, we are in the process of changing the system we use to generate the sheets and the old company will not allow us to publish on line.

    I apologise if my post is seen as advertising, it was not intentional but our web site address had been used and reading through some of the posts I thought it would be helpful.

    i have just looked to see if I could edit out our brand name to just say blue dye or grey dye but I can’t see how

    In recent years there have been many invasive, non native plants introduced into ponds and lakes and in many cases the growth can be so dense that oxygen in the water will be dangerously over 100% during the day and starved at night. This is one reason you nearly always find dead fish floating in the water at daybreak. This is/has been debated for years
  • JoeXJoeX Posts: 1,783
    I appreciate the information, but oxygen in the water dangerously over 100%?  Do you mean beyond the maximum amount of oxygen dissolved in the water?

    Im not familiar with the chemistry here, but that would sound possible.  Unless you’ve got o2 bubbling out maybe?
  • JoeXJoeX Posts: 1,783
    Fishy65 said:
    I wouldn't have that stuff anywhere near my pond and find it amusing where we humans consider ourselves answerable only to ourselves. Did nature get it so wrong that we have to constantly 'fix' it's mistakes?
    I understand the sentiment, the history of unintended consequences has some bad examples.  But I think writing off all attempts to ‘fix’ things is going too far.  Let’s not forget that humans are natural too, as is our extraordinary capability alter our conditions.
  • Over oxygenated water expressed as a percentage. If you imagine perfect water conditions have 100% dissolved oxygen as the standard then over, or under can be written as, for example, 95% (lower) or 110% (higher).
  • LynLyn Posts: 23,190
    @Fishy65 and I made our ponds together,  and I suppose that as we’ve got the balance and positioning right and don’t get blanket weed we can say we don’t want to use additives.
    I don't want anything to inhibit any growth in mine,  it’s a wildlife pond, I followed instructions from a person that has written books on the subject and builds wildlife pond for nature reserves,  the oxygenating weed is shelter and food for tadpoles, I can choose when the plants need thinning out. 
    If you have an ornamental pond, pretty, water features, fish, then that’s ok, I like mine as it is.  I even used my liner upside down because I prefer the brown side up than the black.
    i still don’t understand why it’s best to build your pond in full sun and then use an inhibitor. 

    Gardening on the wild, windy west side of Dartmoor. 

Sign In or Register to comment.